RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.2 first release candidate

[Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:17:14 +0000 <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 10/01/2011 16:53, "Mike Viau" <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:45:59 +0000 <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> 4.0.2-rc1 is now tagged in http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-4.0-testing.hg
> >>
> >> Please test!
> >>
> >> -- Keir
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Are the dependancies unchanged from Xen 4.0?
>
> Should be unchanged since 4.0.1 I believe. We can update the readme or other
> documentation if people find otherwise.
>
> K.
>

I believe I found a missing dependancy with regards to the bison command.

Installed packages (as per the wiki) already are:

bcc bin86 gawk bridge-utils iproute libcurl3 libcurl4-openssl-dev bzip2 module-init-tools transfig tgif texinfo texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-extra texlive-fonts-recommended pciutils-dev mercurial build-essential make gcc libc6-dev zlib1g-dev python python-dev python-twisted libncurses5-dev patch libvncserver-dev libsdl-dev libjpeg62-dev iasl libbz2-dev e2fslibs-dev git-core uuid-dev ocaml libx11-dev gcc-multilib xz-utils

...

make -C libxl install
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/topgun/xen/source/xen-4.0-testing.staging/tools/libxl'
gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m64 -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value -Wdeclaration-after-statement  -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .xl.o.d  -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE  -Werror -I. -fPIC -I../../tools/libxc -I../../tools/include -I../../tools/libxc -I../../tools/include -I../../tools/xenstore -I../../tools/include -c xl.c
gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m64 -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value -Wdeclaration-after-statement  -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .xl_cmdimpl.o.d  -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE  -Werror -I. -fPIC -I../../tools/libxc -I../../tools/include -I../../tools/libxc -I../../tools/include -I../../tools/xenstore -I../../tools/include -c xl_cmdimpl.c
gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m64 -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value -Wdeclaration-after-statement  -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .xl_cmdtable.o.d  -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE  -Werror -I. -fPIC -I../../tools/libxc -I../../tools/include -I../../tools/libxc -I../../tools/include -I../../tools/xenstore -I../../tools/include -c xl_cmdtable.c
bison --output=libxlu_cfg_y.c libxlu_cfg_y.y
make[4]: bison: Command not found
make[4]: *** [libxlu_cfg_y.c] Error 127
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/topgun/xen/source/xen-4.0-testing.staging/tools/libxl'
make[3]: *** [subdir-install-libxl] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/topgun/xen/source/xen-4.0-testing.staging/tools'
make[2]: *** [subdirs-install] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/topgun/xen/source/xen-4.0-testing.staging/tools'
make[1]: *** [install-tools] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/topgun/xen/source/xen-4.0-testing.staging'
make: *** [world] Error 2


I am using amd64 Debian Squeeze so I noticed two packages provide this command.

http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=bison&mode=path&suite=testing&arch=any

Which is advised bison or bison++

Thanks.


-M

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel