[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: minios: don't retrieve the address of void variable
Ian Jackson, le Tue 11 Jan 2011 16:43:55 +0000, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: minios: don't retrieve the > address of void variable"): > > And my signed-off-by was mostly to express that I have completely > > checked the patch and give my formal approval on it for inclusion. My > > former acked-by, as expressed: in SubmittingPatches: üis not as > > formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker has at least > > reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. [...] Acked-by: does > > not necessarily indicate acknowledgement of the entire patch.ý, i.e. it > > looked good to me without giving so formal approval. > > Yes, I think if you meant "I like this patch and think it should be > committed" then Acked-by is correct. Well, in Linux Signed-off-by is also used in that case, e.g. when Andrew Morton applies a patch to his tree (he actually almost never uses Acked-by: 33 overs 30164 in my checkout, I doubt he has acually worked on all these). Samuel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |