[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: libxc: maintain a small, per-handle, cache of hypercall buffer memory (Was: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report)
Hi, Ian, I can not apply your patch. Is this patch developed against more newer version of Xen than what I can have at hand? Shan Haitao 2011/1/26 Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 00:47 +0000, Haitao Shan wrote: >> I think it is basically the same idea as Keir introduced in 20841. I >> guess this bug would happen on platforms which has large number of >> physical CPUs, not only on EX system of Intel. >> If you can cook the patch, that would be great! Thanks!! > > Does this help? > > Ian. > > 8<--------------------------------------- > > # HG changeset patch > # User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > # Date 1296038761 0 > # Node ID 8b8b7e024f9d6f4c2ce1a4efbf38f07eeb460d91 > # Parent e4e69622dc95037eab6740f79ecf9c1d05bca529 > libxc: maintain a small, per-handle, cache of hypercall buffer memory > > Constantly m(un)locking memory can have significant overhead on > systems with large numbers of CPUs. This was previously fixed by > 20841:fbe8f32fa257 but this was dropped during the transition to > hypercall buffers. > > Introduce a small cache of single page hypercall buffer allocations > which can be reused to avoid this overhead. > > Add some statistics tracking to the hypercall buffer allocations. > > The cache size of 4 was chosen based on these statistics since they > indicated that 2 pages was sufficient to satisfy all concurrent single > page hypercall buffer allocations seen during "xl create", "xl > shutdown" and "xl destroy" of both a PV and HVM guest therefore 4 > pages should cover the majority of important cases. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > > diff -r e4e69622dc95 -r 8b8b7e024f9d tools/libxc/xc_hcall_buf.c > --- a/tools/libxc/xc_hcall_buf.c Wed Jan 26 10:22:42 2011 +0000 > +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_hcall_buf.c Wed Jan 26 10:46:01 2011 +0000 > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ > > #include <stdlib.h> > #include <string.h> > +#include <pthread.h> > > #include "xc_private.h" > #include "xg_private.h" > @@ -28,11 +29,108 @@ xc_hypercall_buffer_t XC__HYPERCALL_BUFF > HYPERCALL_BUFFER_INIT_NO_BOUNCE > }; > > +pthread_mutex_t hypercall_buffer_cache_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; > + > +static void hypercall_buffer_cache_lock(xc_interface *xch) > +{ > + if ( xch->flags & XC_OPENFLAG_NON_REENTRANT ) > + return; > + pthread_mutex_lock(&hypercall_buffer_cache_mutex); > +} > + > +static void hypercall_buffer_cache_unlock(xc_interface *xch) > +{ > + if ( xch->flags & XC_OPENFLAG_NON_REENTRANT ) > + return; > + pthread_mutex_unlock(&hypercall_buffer_cache_mutex); > +} > + > +static void *hypercall_buffer_cache_alloc(xc_interface *xch, int nr_pages) > +{ > + void *p = NULL; > + > + hypercall_buffer_cache_lock(xch); > + > + xch->hypercall_buffer_total_allocations++; > + xch->hypercall_buffer_current_allocations++; > + if ( xch->hypercall_buffer_current_allocations > > xch->hypercall_buffer_maximum_allocations ) > + xch->hypercall_buffer_maximum_allocations = > xch->hypercall_buffer_current_allocations; > + > + if ( nr_pages > 1 ) > + { > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_toobig++; > + } > + else if ( xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_nr > 0 ) > + { > + p = xch->hypercall_buffer_cache[--xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_nr]; > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_hits++; > + } > + else > + { > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_misses++; > + } > + > + hypercall_buffer_cache_unlock(xch); > + > + return p; > +} > + > +static int hypercall_buffer_cache_free(xc_interface *xch, void *p, int > nr_pages) > +{ > + int rc = 0; > + > + hypercall_buffer_cache_lock(xch); > + > + xch->hypercall_buffer_total_releases++; > + xch->hypercall_buffer_current_allocations--; > + > + if ( nr_pages == 1 && xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_nr < > HYPERCALL_BUFFER_CACHE_SIZE ) > + { > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache[xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_nr++] = p; > + rc = 1; > + } > + > + hypercall_buffer_cache_unlock(xch); > + > + return rc; > +} > + > +void xc__hypercall_buffer_cache_release(xc_interface *xch) > +{ > + void *p; > + > + hypercall_buffer_cache_lock(xch); > + > + DBGPRINTF("hypercall buffer: total allocations:%d total releases:%d", > + xch->hypercall_buffer_total_allocations, > + xch->hypercall_buffer_total_releases); > + DBGPRINTF("hypercall buffer: current allocations:%d maximum > allocations:%d", > + xch->hypercall_buffer_current_allocations, > + xch->hypercall_buffer_maximum_allocations); > + DBGPRINTF("hypercall buffer: cache current size:%d", > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_nr); > + DBGPRINTF("hypercall buffer: cache hits:%d misses:%d toobig:%d", > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_hits, > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_misses, > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_toobig); > + > + while ( xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_nr > 0 ) > + { > + p = xch->hypercall_buffer_cache[--xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_nr]; > + xch->ops->u.privcmd.free_hypercall_buffer(xch, xch->ops_handle, p, > 1); > + } > + > + hypercall_buffer_cache_unlock(xch); > +} > + > void *xc__hypercall_buffer_alloc_pages(xc_interface *xch, > xc_hypercall_buffer_t *b, int nr_pages) > { > - void *p = xch->ops->u.privcmd.alloc_hypercall_buffer(xch, > xch->ops_handle, nr_pages); > + void *p = hypercall_buffer_cache_alloc(xch, nr_pages); > > - if (!p) > + if ( !p ) > + p = xch->ops->u.privcmd.alloc_hypercall_buffer(xch, xch->ops_handle, > nr_pages); > + > + if ( !p ) > return NULL; > > b->hbuf = p; > @@ -47,7 +145,8 @@ void xc__hypercall_buffer_free_pages(xc_ > if ( b->hbuf == NULL ) > return; > > - xch->ops->u.privcmd.free_hypercall_buffer(xch, xch->ops_handle, b->hbuf, > nr_pages); > + if ( !hypercall_buffer_cache_free(xch, b->hbuf, nr_pages) ) > + xch->ops->u.privcmd.free_hypercall_buffer(xch, xch->ops_handle, > b->hbuf, nr_pages); > } > > struct allocation_header { > diff -r e4e69622dc95 -r 8b8b7e024f9d tools/libxc/xc_private.c > --- a/tools/libxc/xc_private.c Wed Jan 26 10:22:42 2011 +0000 > +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_private.c Wed Jan 26 10:46:01 2011 +0000 > @@ -126,6 +126,16 @@ static struct xc_interface_core *xc_inte > xch->error_handler = logger; xch->error_handler_tofree = 0; > xch->dombuild_logger = dombuild_logger; xch->dombuild_logger_tofree = 0; > > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_nr = 0; > + > + xch->hypercall_buffer_total_allocations = 0; > + xch->hypercall_buffer_total_releases = 0; > + xch->hypercall_buffer_current_allocations = 0; > + xch->hypercall_buffer_maximum_allocations = 0; > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_hits = 0; > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_misses = 0; > + xch->hypercall_buffer_cache_toobig = 0; > + > xch->ops_handle = XC_OSDEP_OPEN_ERROR; > xch->ops = NULL; > > @@ -171,6 +181,8 @@ static int xc_interface_close_common(xc_ > static int xc_interface_close_common(xc_interface *xch) > { > int rc = 0; > + > + xc_hypercall_buffer_cache_release(xch); > > xtl_logger_destroy(xch->dombuild_logger_tofree); > xtl_logger_destroy(xch->error_handler_tofree); > diff -r e4e69622dc95 -r 8b8b7e024f9d tools/libxc/xc_private.h > --- a/tools/libxc/xc_private.h Wed Jan 26 10:22:42 2011 +0000 > +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_private.h Wed Jan 26 10:46:01 2011 +0000 > @@ -75,6 +75,28 @@ struct xc_interface_core { > FILE *dombuild_logger_file; > const char *currently_progress_reporting; > > + /* > + * A simple cache of unused, single page, hypercall buffers > + * > + * Protected by a global lock. > + */ > +#define HYPERCALL_BUFFER_CACHE_SIZE 4 > + int hypercall_buffer_cache_nr; > + void *hypercall_buffer_cache[HYPERCALL_BUFFER_CACHE_SIZE]; > + > + /* > + * Hypercall buffer statistics. All protected by the global > + * hypercall_buffer_cache lock. > + */ > + int hypercall_buffer_total_allocations; > + int hypercall_buffer_total_releases; > + int hypercall_buffer_current_allocations; > + int hypercall_buffer_maximum_allocations; > + int hypercall_buffer_cache_hits; > + int hypercall_buffer_cache_misses; > + int hypercall_buffer_cache_toobig; > + > + /* Low lovel OS interface */ > xc_osdep_info_t osdep; > xc_osdep_ops *ops; /* backend operations */ > xc_osdep_handle ops_handle; /* opaque data for xc_osdep_ops */ > @@ -156,6 +178,11 @@ int xc__hypercall_bounce_pre(xc_interfac > #define xc_hypercall_bounce_pre(_xch, _name) xc__hypercall_bounce_pre(_xch, > HYPERCALL_BUFFER(_name)) > void xc__hypercall_bounce_post(xc_interface *xch, xc_hypercall_buffer_t > *bounce); > #define xc_hypercall_bounce_post(_xch, _name) > xc__hypercall_bounce_post(_xch, HYPERCALL_BUFFER(_name)) > + > +/* > + * Release hypercall buffer cache > + */ > +void xc__hypercall_buffer_cache_release(xc_interface *xch); > > /* > * Hypercall interfaces. > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |