Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 19:56 +0000, Kamala Narasimhan wrote:
> The format in which disk information is required in xl block-attach is 
> different
> than the one expected in the disk configuration option (in the config file).  
> It
> might make sense to keep the two consistent (excluding the domain/backend dom 
> id
> additional param block-attach would require).  Would it be alright if I 
> enforce
> it in our implementation (in main_blockattach in xl_cmdimpl.c) and modify
> block-attach help to reflect that change?

I think it makes sense to have them be the same (or as similar as
possible).

OOI, do the xm block-attach and xm config syntaxes differ from each too?

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel