[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xen-devel][PATCH 0/5] xl disk configuration handling


  • To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Kamala Narasimhan <kamala.narasimhan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:26:53 -0500
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:27:48 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jHoWMielG8nJrcOOqxD0ub1zevzlYe/JkOG9hb+4vVerUau+UutzDPL65dBBLycwV8 akyVeAHrhm7AVpI4A4+62na7I5LRE/XSownOZyhqnuw4fmY9wnXNdRkKBn/CKz3+01z4 V1m8MRwDmXkwUlBg2vsF3eRXrIDWEHoOx5pq0=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Kamala Narasimhan wrote:
> Refactor xl disk configuration handling.
> 
> Patch 1/5 - "Xl Disk Configuration Option" documentation
> Patch 2/5 - Xl interface change plus changes to code it impacts
> Patch 3/5 - Xl disk configuration parsing changes
> Patch 4/5 - Xl block-attach refactoring to reuse xl parsing code
> Patch 5/5 - More disk validation checks
> 
> Note:  I am nervous about this patch series as the changes are huge and I am
> worried about regressions especially this close to 4.1.  I can try and fix the
> regressions fast but only after they are found and reported.  So, I would
> encourage folks to run their standard config files that they knew worked 
> before
> against the latest changes and report any/all regressions.  Thanks!
> 
Note: Upon further discussion a decision was made to go with patches 1 & 2 for
4.1 and the rest will be reposted for 4.2 and would include relevant review
comments.

Kamala



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.