[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] A question about libxl


  • To: ääå <sploving1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:05:43 +0000
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 02:08:00 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=pLheIM96byDs5nM2uf4ewdoxrTFHEpiuXuCdigWX9pSpbEdqU47rg3cv6YPsQBG4la M99vct2Tb8QofDAXqE90Su1RGlwlX7slWmYxqUMDzlMGjvsa5MZDLsEimHDM3I0klE8c FWSEIyxmUNFeVZyPrHSda7PKXXVD8WT3cXYcc=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

libxl is not faster than libxc; libxl is faster than xend.  xend is a
very large daemon, written in python, designed to do managment of VMs.
 The "xm" program doesn't actually do anything itself; it sends a
request to xend, and then waits for the answer.

 -George

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:56 PM, ääå <sploving1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
> ÂÂ ÂÂAs we know, Âwe package the privcmd, evtchn, gntdev,etc, IOCTL
> interface to implement libxc, are there any docs about how to
> implementÂlibxl? It says libxl relies on libxc, libxenguest, xenstore, etc,
> to
> implement them, then why is libxl faster than libxc sometimes?(for example,
> "xl list" and "xm list") .
> --
> ÂÂÂÂ Best Regards,
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ÂÂÂÂÂ Baozeng
> Ding
>
> OSTG,NFS,ISCAS
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.