[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] RE: Kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61
> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:26:14 +0800
> Subject: Re: Kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61
> From: giamteckchoon@xxxxxxxxx
> To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jeremy@xxxxxxxx; konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> 2011/4/14 MaoXiaoyun <tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I've done test with "cpuidle=0 cpufreq=none", two machine crashed.
> >
> > blktap_sysfs_destroy
> > blktap_sysfs_destroy
> > blktap_sysfs_create: adding attributes for dev ffff8800ad581000
> > blktap_sysfs_create: adding attributes for dev ffff8800a48e3e00
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61!
> > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > last sysfs&nbs
p;file: /sys/block/tapdeve/dev
> > CPU 0
> > Modules linked in: 8021q garp blktap xen_netback xen_blkback blkback_pagemap nbd bridge stp llc autofs4 ipmi_devintf ipmi_si ipmi_ms
> > ghandler lockd sunrpc bonding ipv6 xenfs dm_multipath video output sbs sbshc parport_pc lp parport ses enclosure snd_seq_dummy bnx2
> > serio_raw snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm i2c_i801 snd_timer i2c_core snd iT
> > CO_wdt pata_acpi soundcore iTCO_vendor_
> > support ata_generic snd_page_alloc pcspkr ata_piix shpchp mptsas mptscsih mptbase [last unloa
> > ded: freq_table]
>
> Pid: 8022, comm: khelper Not tainted 2.6.32.36xen #1 Tecal RH2285
> > RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8103a3cb>] [<ffffffff8103a3cb>] leave_mm+0x15/0x46
> > RSP: e02b:ffff88002803ee48 EFLAGS: 00010046
> > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffffff81675980
> > RDX: ffff88002803ee78 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> > RBP: ffff88002803ee48 R08: ffff8800a4929000 R09: dead000000200200
> > R10: dead000000100100 R11: ffffffff81447292 R12: ffff88012ba07b80
> > R13: ffff880028046020 R14: 00000000000004fb R15: 0000000000000000
> > FS: 00007f410af416e0(0000) GS:ffff88002803b000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS: e033 DS: 00
00 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> > CR2: 0000000000469000 CR3: 00000000ad639000 CR4: 0000000000002660
> > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > Process khelper (pid: 8022, threadinfo ffff8800a4846000, task ffff8800a9ed0000)
> > Stack:
> > ffff88002803ee68 ffffffff8100e4a4 0000000000000001 ffff880097de3b88
> > <0> ffff88002803ee98 ffffffff81087224 ffff88002803ee78 ffff88002803ee78
> > <0> ffff88015f808180 00000000000004fb ffff88002803eea8 ffffffff810100e8
> > Call Trace:
> > <IRQ>
> > [<ffffffff8100e4a4>] drop_other_mm_ref+0x2a/0x53
> >
[<ffffffff81087224>] generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0xd8/0xfc
> > [<ffffffff810100e8>] xen_call_function_single_interrupt+0x13/0x28
> > [<ffffffff810a936a>] handle_IRQ_event+0x66/0x120
> > [<ffffffff810aac5b>] handle_percpu_irq+0x41/0x6e
> > [<ffffffff8128c1a8>] __xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x1ab/0x27d
> > [<ffffffff8128dcf9>] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x33/0x46
> > [<ffffffff81013efe>] xen_do_hypervisor_callback+0x1e/0x30
> > <EOI>
> > [<ffffffff81447292>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x15/0x17
> > [<ffffffff8100f8af>] ? xen_restore_fl_direct_end+0x0/0x1
> > [<ffffffff81113f75>] ? flush_old_exec+0x3ac/0x500
> > [<ffffffff81150dc9>] ? load_elf_binary+0x0/0x17ef
> > [<ffffffff81150dc9>] ? load_elf_binary+0x0/0x17ef
> > [<ffffffff81151161>] ? load_elf_binary+0x398/0x17ef
> > [<ffffffff81042fcf>] ? need_resched+0x23/0x2d
> >
> > [<ffffffff811f463c>] ? process_measurement+0xc0/0xd7
> > [<ffffffff81150dc9>] ? load_elf_binary+0x0/0x17ef
> > [<ffffffff81113098>] ? search_binary_handler+0xc8/0x255
> > [<ffffffff81114366>] ? do_execve+0x1c3/0x29e
> > [<ffffffff8101155d>] ? sys_execve+0x43/0x5d
> > [<ffffffff8106fc45>] ? __call_usermodehelper+0x0/0x6f
> > [<ffffffff81013e28>] ? kernel_execve+0x68/0xd0
> > [<ffffffff8106fc45>] ? __call_usermodehelper+0x0/0x6f
> > [<ffffffff8100f8af>]
;? xen_restore_fl_direct_end+0x0/0x1
> > [<ffffffff8106fb64>] ? ____call_usermodehelper+0x113/0x11e
> > [<ffffffff81013daa>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
> > [<ffffffff8106fc45>] ? __call_usermodehelper+0x0/0x6f
> > [<ffffffff81012f91>] ? int_ret_from_sys_call+0x7/0x1b
> > [<ffffffff8101371d>] ? retint_restore_args+0x5/0x6
> > [<ffffffff81013da0>] ? c
> > hild_rip+0x0/0x20
> > Code: 41 5e 41 5f c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 0f 1f 44 00 00 e8 17 ff ff ff c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 0f 1f 44 00 00 65 8b 04 25 c8 55 01 00 ff c8 75 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 65 48&nbs
p;8b 34 25 c0 55 01 00 48 81 c6 b8 02 00 00 e8
> > RIP [<ffffffff8103a3cb>] leave_mm+0x15/0x46
> > RSP <ffff88002803ee48>
> > ---[ end trace 1522f17fdfc9162d ]---
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
> > Pid: 8022, comm: khelper Tainted: G D 2.6.32.36xen #1
> > Call Trace:
> > <IRQ> [<ffffffff8105682e>] panic+0xe0/0x19a
> > [<ffffffff8144006a>] ? init_amd+0x296/0x37a
>
> Hmmm... both machines are using AMD CPU? Did you hit the same bug on Intel CPU?
>
>
It is Intel CPU, not AMD.
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
> > [<ffffffff8100f169>] ? xen_force_evtchn_callback+0xd/0xf
> > [<ffffffff8100f8c2>] ? check_events+0x12/0x20
> > [<ffffffff8100f8af>] ? xen_restore_fl_direct_end+0x0/0x1
> > [<ffffffff81056487>] ? print_oops_end_marker+0x23/0x25
> > [<ffffffff81448165>] oops_end+0xb6/0xc6
> > [<ffffffff810166e5>] die+0x5a/0x63
> > [<ffffffff81447a3c>] do_trap+0x115/0x124
> > [<ffffffff810148e6>] do_invalid_op+0x9c/0xa5
> > [<ffffffff8103a3cb>] ? leave_mm+0x15/0x46
> > [<ffffffff8100f6e6>] ? xen_clocksource_read+0x21/0x23
> > [<ffffffff8100f258>] ? HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op+0xf/0x11
> > [<ffffffff8100f753>] ? xen_vcpuop_set_next_event+0x52/0x67
>
> [<ffffffff81013b3b>] invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
> > [<ffffffff81447292>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x15/0x17
> > [<ffffffff8103a3cb>] ? leave_mm+0x15/0x46
> > [<ffffffff8100e4a4>] drop_other_mm_ref+0x2a/0x53
> > [<ffffffff81087224>] generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0xd8/0xfc
> > [<ffffffff810100e8>] xen_call_function_single_interrupt+0x13/0x28
> > [<ffffffff810a936a>] handle_IRQ_event+0x66/0x120
> > [<ffffffff810aac5b>] handle_percpu_irq+0x41/0x6e
> > [<ffffffff8128c1a8>] __xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x1ab/0x27d
> > [<ffffffff8128dcf9>] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x33/0x46
> > [<ffffffff81013efe>] xen_do_hypervisor_callback+0x1e/0x30
> > <EOI> [<ffffffff81447292
>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x15/0x17
> > [<ffffffff8100f8af>] ? xen_restore_fl_direct_end+0x0/0x1
> > [<ffffffff81113f75>] ? flush_old_exec+0x3ac/0x500
> > [<ffffffff81150dc9>] ? load_elf_binary+0x0/0x17ef
> > [<ffffffff81150dc9>] ? load_elf_binary+0x0/0x17ef
> > [<ffffffff81151161>] ? load_elf_binary+0x398/0x17ef
> > [<ffffffff81042fcf>] ? need_resched+0x23/0x
> > 2d
> > [<ffffffff811f463c>] ? process_measurement+0xc0/0xd7
> > [<ffffffff81150dc9>] ? load_elf_binary+0x0/0x17ef
> > [<ffffffff81113098>] ? search_binary_handler+0xc8/0x255
> > [<ffffffff81114366>] ? do_execve+0x1c3/0x29e
> > [<ffffffff8101155d>] ? sys_exe
cve+0x43/0x5d
> > [<ffffffff8106fc45>] ? __call_usermodehelper+0x0/0x6f
> > [<ffffffff81013e28>] ? kernel_execve+0x68/0xd0
> > [<ffffffff8106fc45>] ? __call_usermodehelper+0x0/0x6f
> > [<ffffffff8100f8af>] ? xen_restore_fl_direct_end+0x0/0x1
> > [<ffffffff8106fb64>] ? ____call_usermodehelper+0x113/0x11e
> > [<ffffffff81013daa>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
> > [<ffffffff8106fc45>] ? __call_usermodehelper+0x0/0x6f
> > [<ffffffff81012f91>] ? int_ret_from_sys_call+0x7/0x1b
> > [<ffffffff8101371d>] ? retint_restore_args+0x5/0x6
> > [<ffffffff81013da0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> > (XEN) Domain 0 crashed: 'noreboot' set - not rebooting.
> >
> >> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:00:00 -0400
> >> From: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> CC: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; giamteckchoon@xxxxxxxxx;
> >> jeremy@xxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: Kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 05:11:51PM +0800, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi :
> >> >
> >> > We are using pvops kernel 2.6.32.36 + xen 4.0.1, but confront a kernel
> >> > panic bug.
> >> >
> >> > 2.6.32.36 Kernel:
> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=commit;h=bb1a15e55ec665a64c8a9c6bd699b1f16ac01ff4
> >> > Xen 4.0.1 http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-4.0-testing.hg/rev/b536ebfba183
> >> >
> >> > Our test is simple, 24 HVMS(Win2003 )
on a single host, each HVM loopes
> >> > in restart every 15minutes.
> >>
> >> What is the storage that you are using for your guests? AoE? Local disks?
> >>
> >> > About 17 machines are invovled in the test, after 10 hours run, one
> >> > confrontted a crash at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61
> >> >
> >> > Currently I am trying "cpuidle=0 cpufreq=none" tests based on Teck's
> >> > suggestion.
> >> >
> >> > Any comments, thanks.
> >> >
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
