[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [Xen-devel] if hvm better than pv?why dd in hvm vm no larger than 50M, while pv greater than 50

To: yue <ooolinux@xxxxxxx>
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:54:21 -0400
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:55:18 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:48:31PM +0800, yue wrote:
> 1.i find  pv disk'throughput is better than hvm. i want to know why?

Pick up "The definitive guide to the Xen hypervisor" book.
> 2.pci passthrough  is said to improve performance, if it is default method of 
> IO-process.

Sure. But it also makes migration difficult.
>  3.do you familar with ocfs2's source code?

No.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] if hvm better than pv?why dd in hvm vm no larger than 50M, while pv greater than 50
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- [Xen-devel] if hvm better than pv?why dd in hvm vm no larger than 50M, while pv greater than 50
  - From: yue
- Re:Re: [Xen-devel] if hvm better than pv?why dd in hvm vm no larger than 50M, while pv greater than 50
  - From: yue

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] Mixed results -- VGA Passthrough with Intel 82Q35 IGD
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Mixed results -- VGA Passthrough with Intel 82Q35 IGD
Previous by thread: Re:Re: [Xen-devel] if hvm better than pv?why dd in hvm vm no larger than 50M, while pv greater than 50
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [linux test] 6906: regressions - FAIL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.