[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] FPU LWP 6/8: create lazy and non-lazy FPU restore functions

[Wei Huang <wei.huang2@xxxxxxx>]

Checking whether there is a non-lazy state to save is architectural 
specific and very messy. For instance, we need to read LWP_CBADDR to 
confirm LWP's dirty state. This MSR is AMD specific and we don't want to 
add it here. Plus reading data from LWP_CBADDR MSR might be as expensive 
as clts/stts.
My previous email showed that the overhead with LWP is around 1%-2% of 
__context_switch(). For non lwp-capable CPU, this overhead should be 
much smaller (only clts and stts) because xfeature_mask[LWP] is 0.
Yes, clts() and stts() don't have to called every time. How about this one?

/* Restore FPU state whenever VCPU is schduled in. */
void vcpu_restore_fpu_eager(struct vcpu *v)
{
    ASSERT(!is_idle_vcpu(v));


    /* save the nonlazy extended state which is not tracked by CR0.TS bit */
    if ( xsave_enabled(v) )
    {
        /* Avoid recursion */
        clts();
        fpu_xrstor(v, XSTATE_NONLAZY);
        stts();
    }

.

On 05/04/2011 02:09 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 03.05.11 at 22:17, Wei Huang<wei.huang2@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
> Again as pointed out earlier, ...
>
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c     Tue May 03 13:49:27 2011 -0500
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c     Tue May 03 13:59:37 2011 -0500
> > @@ -1578,6 +1578,7 @@
> >          memcpy(stack_regs,&n->arch.user_regs, CTXT_SWITCH_STACK_BYTES);
> >          if ( xsave_enabled(n)&&  n->arch.xcr0 != get_xcr0() )
> >              set_xcr0(n->arch.xcr0);
> > +        vcpu_restore_fpu_eager(n);
> ... this call is unconditional, ...
>
> >          n->arch.ctxt_switch_to(n);
> >      }
> >
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/i387.c       Tue May 03 13:49:27 2011 -0500
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/i387.c       Tue May 03 13:59:37 2011 -0500
> > @@ -160,10 +160,25 @@
> > /*******************************/
> > /*       VCPU FPU Functions    */
> > /*******************************/
> > +/* Restore FPU state whenever VCPU is schduled in. */
> > +void vcpu_restore_fpu_eager(struct vcpu *v)
> > +{
> > +    ASSERT(!is_idle_vcpu(v));
> > +
> > +    /* Avoid recursion */
> > +    clts();
> > +
> > +    /* save the nonlazy extended state which is not tracked by CR0.TS bit */
> > +    if ( xsave_enabled(v) )
> > +        fpu_xrstor(v, XSTATE_NONLAZY);
> > +
> > +    stts();
> ... while here you do an unconditional clts followed by an xrstor only
> checking whether xsave is enabled (but not checking whether there's
> any non-lazy state to be restored) and, possibly the most expensive
> of all, an unconditional write of CR0.
>
> Jan
>
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> >   * Restore FPU state when #NM is triggered.
> >   */
> > -void vcpu_restore_fpu(struct vcpu *v)
> > +void vcpu_restore_fpu_lazy(struct vcpu *v)
> > {
> >      ASSERT(!is_idle_vcpu(v));


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel