Re: [Xen-devel] full featured, fully bug-fix pv-ops branch?

[Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>]

On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:16:11PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Jeremy, Konrad,
> 
> stumbling over this once in a while (this time looking for where Dominic's
> "blktap: Fix reference to freed struct request" patch ended up, without
> any success so far) I wonder what pv-ops branch(es) is (are) supposed
> to be the one(s) (e.g.) distros ought to use - that is, fully featured (at
> least as far as non-experimental features go) *and* fully bug-fixed.
> 
> The branches XenParavirtOps on the wiki points to don't seem to be the
> ones (some of them seem not to have a blktap implementation at all),
> and gathering bits from various people's private trees can't be the
> ultimate solution...
> 

Afaik Jeremy's xen.git xen/stable-2.6.32.x is supposed to be the
long-term stable branch, following upstream kernel.org long-term branch.

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel