[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: xl/xm save -c fails - set_vcpucontext EOPNOTSUPP (was Re: [Xen-devel] xl save -c issues with Windows 7 Ultimate)


  • To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:10:17 +0100
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 12 May 2011 01:12:25 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=lXQQ4rfC6wSA3y4LTMRjkk+5uQ0D66wVxn/LzVKKtmmXFeal1ZeYfkbFe2SfUdaQXA +KdMilZuXEL7PkUeAwacNnfjZ/w1+IzEP2QoEfSVoj1lZ1BWswkY1dmvNBKU+Pgbt1rk 48XBkMg0bT3iVerGHkPMhZHt8FEMiSmO1nF9o=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcwQfAc37PxFJmRctUux0VDVeqtBRA==
  • Thread-topic: xl/xm save -c fails - set_vcpucontext EOPNOTSUPP (was Re: [Xen-devel] xl save -c issues with Windows 7 Ultimate)

On 11/05/2011 08:47, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The question is whether there are other inconsistencies lurking, and
> hence whether it wouldn't be better to mark a vCPU on which setting
> the context failed, not allowing it to resume or have its context
> obtained anymore. That appears quite drastic though - Keir, what's
> your opinion here?

Hm, I think overall we just need to get the error-path handling in this
function correct. I think it'll be a bit ugly to kludge around that.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.