[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Patches for PCI passthrough with modified E820 (v3) - resent.
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:41 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > Can you actually allocate and use (nearly) all of that 4G? (modulo > > kernel allocations/overheads etc). The above doesn't really show that > > memhog 4G worked great.. but then I noticed it started slowing down and > it was using the swap disk? I guess the I/O holes shadowed the RAM and hence it is basically wasted. [...] > Anyhow, seems that if you are using RHEL5, SLES11, you need to be carefull to > use 'memory' and 'maxmem'. Hrm, changing behaviour for existing guests isn't so nice, at least not without a way to turn the behaviour off, perhaps we do need an explicit cfg file variable to control this after all? > With the PVOPS, need to balloon up and you are OK. > > Thought I do want to see about writting the code that would automatically > balloon > back to the amount of memory that was deflated. I wonder if just writing the correct balloon target to xenstore while building the guest would be sufficient for the guest to balloon up once it's up? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |