[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] Xen security advisory CVE-2011-1898 - VT-d (PCI passthrough) MSI
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 22:34 +0100, Cihula, Joseph wrote: > > - if ( iommu_intremap ) > > - { > > + > > Unless I'm misreading it, this will prevent users from specifying > "no-intremap" to disable the use of IR. That wasn't my intention. > Why would you keep the 'if ( iommu_intremap )' on the previous code > block but remove it here? To be honest this change was a little bit unrelated, which was naughty of me. I saw: if ( iommu_intremap ) { THING A } if ( iommu_intremap ) { THING B } and changed it to if (iommu_intremap ) { THING A THING B } Is there some subtlety to this code path that I've missed? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |