Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 45] gcc 4.6 compile fixes for xen-unstable

[Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>]

On 20/05/2011 09:28, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>  makes we wonder whether we
>> shouldn't simply turn of the unused-but-set-variable warning
>> altogether, or at least not have it be an error. Not the least
>> because I'm not sure it'd be nice to backport all of these changes
>> into older trees (which obviously would suffer mostly the same
>> problems when built with 4.6 or newer).
> 
> Perhaps we should do both -- take the fixes into unstable and disable
> the warning in 4.1?

We should just disable the warning. Job done, don't need to take the uglier
"fixes".

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel