Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer...

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:06:38AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:03:58AM +0200, Carsten Schiers wrote:
> > Thanks for your support. 
> > 
> > So the plan is to run the very kernel (2.6.32.40 from Jeremy's git) 
> > natively, without Xen, and check 
> > what acpi.debug and my printks are reporting?
> > 
> > Would the other check be to change pr_id from -1 to 0 by some helper code 
> > in the right place?
> > 
> > Have I correctly understood that my BIOS seems to implement C-States 
> > through FADT instead of _CST, 
> > which is ok generally, but the FADT PBLK is not correctly set (maybe 
> > because it worries about the -1)?
> 
> So the FADT PBLK is about this line:
>             Processor (CP00, 0x10, 0x00000410, 0x06)
> 
> in your DSDT. The 0x0000410 is the PBLK and somehow it is NULL on your box. 
> You could
> run iasl -d on the DSDT to find out what exactly is there.
> 
> But I *think* that should not affect the C-states as it is just used for 
> reserving some
> CardBus regions.

Or maybe not:http://www.coreboot.org/ACPI

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel