[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer...
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:06:38AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:03:58AM +0200, Carsten Schiers wrote: > > Thanks for your support. > > > > So the plan is to run the very kernel (2.6.32.40 from Jeremy's git) > > natively, without Xen, and check > > what acpi.debug and my printks are reporting? > > > > Would the other check be to change pr_id from -1 to 0 by some helper code > > in the right place? > > > > Have I correctly understood that my BIOS seems to implement C-States > > through FADT instead of _CST, > > which is ok generally, but the FADT PBLK is not correctly set (maybe > > because it worries about the -1)? > > So the FADT PBLK is about this line: > Processor (CP00, 0x10, 0x00000410, 0x06) > > in your DSDT. The 0x0000410 is the PBLK and somehow it is NULL on your box. > You could > run iasl -d on the DSDT to find out what exactly is there. > > But I *think* that should not affect the C-states as it is just used for > reserving some > CardBus regions. Or maybe not:http://www.coreboot.org/ACPI _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |