Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] tools/libxc: Remus Checkpoint Compression

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] tools/libxc: Remus 
Checkpoint Compression"):
> FYI, I am not (and do not wish to be) the maintainer for the
> save/restore/migration/remus code; I'm just an interested party (since
> if it breaks, I'm going to have to deal with it when it comes into
> XenServer).  As such, my "Ack" was only meant to mean, "I'm fine with
> this" (since I had raised an objection before).  IanJ's approval is
> still needed for check-in.

Right.

> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:

> > There is no change to live migration protocol. Its just the remus
> > replication protocol, which I would be happy to document in
> > xg_save_restore.h.

Right, yes, please.

> > Can I send that as a separate patch?

That would be fine.

> > George already acked the code part
> > of the patch (see b4974a38d10199c1e2b8.1308457939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

I will try to give it a proper review myself.

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel