Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v3] replace d->nr_pirqs sized arrays with radix tree

[Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 21/06/2011 08:51, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With this it is questionable whether retaining struct domain's nr_pirqs
> is actually necessary - the value now only serves for bounds checking,
> and this boundary could easily be nr_irqs.
> 
> Note that ia64, the build of which is broken currently anyway, is only
> being partially fixed up.
> 
> v2: adjustments for split setup/teardown of translation data
> 
> v3: re-sync with radix tree implementation changes

What is the reason for rcu-head.h?

 -- Keir

> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel