[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Konrad devel/next-3.0, pci-passthrough not working: Error: pci: PCI Backend and pci-stub don't own device
Wednesday, June 22, 2011, 4:00:22 PM, you wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:02:29PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> >> Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 7:05:25 PM, you wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:11:42PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> >> Hello Konrad, >> >> >> >> Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 4:13:55 PM, you wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> >> >> Hi Konrad, >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm trying to use a kernel compiled from your devel/next-3.0 branch. >> >> >> >> > Ok, good. >> >> >> But trying to start a PV guest with pci-passthrough makes xen complain: >> >> >> >> >> >> xm create /etc/xen/domU/production/security.cfg >> >> >> Using config file "/etc/xen/domU/production/security.cfg". >> >> >> Error: pci: PCI Backend and pci-stub don't own device 0000:04:00.0 >> >> >> >> Ah it seems to be the sysfs indeed, in >> >> module name: xen_pciback >> >> driver: xen-pciback >> >> > This is above (and the sysfs below) is 2.6.39 based and it worked? >> >> >> >> in 3.0 the >> >> module name: xen_pciback >> >> driver: pciback >> >> >> >> Quite a mix of names, and different use of minus and underscore. >> >> > Hmm, you are a right. I somehow I thought I backed up the patch that >> > used the wrong name (well, not wrong but just incorrect). >> >> So if I understand you correct you will revert the driver name from >> xen-pciback to pciback, so no xen change is needed ? > So this patch: > f3fc28d52f42220bcce8c2fed12aef2a88c9fadc > xen/pciback: revert the name of the PCI driver to 'pciback'. > should have done the trick but I am not seeing it in the > devel/xen-pciback-0.6.. Aha! I forgot to push the branch up to git.kernel.org. > Before I do that, can you cherry-pick that one please and tell > me if it works? If it does I will stick 'Reported-by' and 'Tested-by' > on the patch if you are OK with that. And were exactly do i cherry pick that from ? :-) since you say you haven't pushed it :p If you can attach the patch i will test it right away, sticking the reported and tested-by is fine ! -- Sander -- Best regards, Sander mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |