|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 8109: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/pass
flight 8109 xen-4.0-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8109/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-amd64-pv 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 8015 test-amd64-amd64-pair 10 leak-check/basis/dst_host(10) fail REGR. vs. 8015 test-amd64-amd64-pair 9 leak-check/basis/src_host(9) fail REGR. vs. 8015 test-amd64-amd64-xl 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 8015 test-amd64-amd64-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 8015 test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 8015 test-amd64-i386-pv 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-i386-i386-pv 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-i386-i386-xl 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-amd64-i386-xl 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-i386-i386-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-i386-i386-pair 9 leak-check/basis/src_host(9) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-i386-i386-pair 10 leak-check/basis/dst_host(10) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-amd64-i386-pair 9 leak-check/basis/src_host(9) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-amd64-i386-pair 10 leak-check/basis/dst_host(10) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-amd64-i386-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 test-i386-i386-xl-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 REGR. vs. 8010 Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): build-i386-pvops 3 host-build-prep fail pass in 8102 build-i386-oldkern 3 host-build-prep fail pass in 8102 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking, including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail never pass test-amd64-i386-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-i386-i386-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-i386-i386-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-i386-i386-win 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-i386-i386-pair 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-pair 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-win 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-i386-i386-xl-win 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail in 8102 blocked in 8015 version targeted for testing: xen 89608751ccfc baseline version: xen a353b8304f7a ------------------------------------------------------------ People who touched revisions under test: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> ------------------------------------------------------------ jobs: build-amd64 pass build-i386 pass build-amd64-oldkern pass build-i386-oldkern broken build-amd64-pvops pass build-i386-pvops broken test-amd64-amd64-xl broken test-amd64-i386-xl blocked test-i386-i386-xl blocked test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd blocked test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 blocked test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel broken test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel blocked test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu blocked test-amd64-amd64-pair broken test-amd64-i386-pair blocked test-i386-i386-pair blocked test-amd64-amd64-pv broken test-amd64-i386-pv blocked test-i386-i386-pv blocked test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 blocked test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 blocked test-amd64-amd64-win broken test-amd64-i386-win blocked test-i386-i386-win blocked test-amd64-amd64-xl-win broken test-i386-i386-xl-win blocked ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs images: /home/xc_osstest/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary Not pushing. ------------------------------------------------------------ changeset: 21521:89608751ccfc tag: tip user: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> date: Sat Jul 16 09:35:13 2011 +0100 x86: fix guest migration after c/s 20892:d311d1efc25e Guests would not manage to run successfully after being migrated to a host having sufficiently much more memory than the host they were originally started on. Subsequently the plan is to re-enable the changes behavior under the control of a guest kernel announced feature flag. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> xen-unstable changeset: 23706:3dd399873c9e xen-unstable date: Sat Jul 16 09:18:21 2011 +0100 changeset: 21520:fd9e72e1b1c3 user: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> date: Sat Jul 16 09:34:57 2011 +0100 xen/libxc: set CPUID topology leaf as unsupported for PV guests The result of a CPUID Extended Topology Enumeration leaf for PV guests is invalid as the level in ECX is ignored. This can cause some guests to loop endlessly when trying to enumerate the topology. Since the physical topology isn't useful to PV guests set the topology leaf as unsupported. Guests affected include Linux kernels prior 2.6.32 where a workaround was applied ("xen: mask extended topology info in cpu", 82d6469916c6fcfa345636a49004c9d1753905d1). Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> xen-unstable changeset: 23700:867bb675b57b xen-unstable date: Sat Jul 16 09:05:45 2011 +0100 changeset: 21519:a353b8304f7a user: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> date: Fri Jul 08 09:02:03 2011 +0100 x86/hvm: Don't expose CPUID time leaf when not using PVRDTSCP Some versions of Oracle's Solaris PV drivers make a check that the maximal Xen hypervisor CPUID leaf is <= base leaf + 2 and refuse to work if this is not the case. The addition of the time leaf makes the maximal leaf == base leaf + 3 so this patch introduces a workaround that obscures the time leaf unless PVRDTSCP is in operation. Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> xen-unstable changeset: 23661:8fe6f4be18aa xen-unstable date: Fri Jul 08 08:31:10 2011 +0100 (qemu changes not included) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |