[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: Linux Stubdom Problem
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote: > 2011/7/19 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > CC'ing Tim and xen-devel > > > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote: > >> 2011/7/16 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote: > >> >> 2011/7/15 Jiageng Yu <yujiageng734@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> >> > 2011/7/15 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> >> >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote: > >> >> >>> > Does it mean you are actually able to boot an HVM guest using > >> >> >>> > Linux > >> >> >>> > based stubdoms?? Did you manage to solve the framebuffer problem > >> >> >>> > too? > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> The HVM guest is booted. But the boot process is terminated because > >> >> >>> vga bios is not invoked by seabios. I have got stuck here for a > >> >> >>> week. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> There was a bug in xen-unstable.hg or seabios that would prevent vga > >> >> >> bios from > >> >> >> being loaded, it should be fixed now. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Alternatively you can temporarely work around the issue with this > >> >> >> hacky patch: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> --- > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> diff -r 00d2c5ca26fd tools/firmware/hvmloader/hvmloader.c > >> >> >> --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/hvmloader.c   ÂFri Jul 08 18:35:24 > >> >> >> 2011 +0100 > >> >> >> +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/hvmloader.c   ÂFri Jul 15 11:37:12 > >> >> >> 2011 +0000 > >> >> >> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ int main(void) > >> >> >>       bios->create_pir_tables(); > >> >> >>   } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -  Âif ( bios->load_roms ) > >> >> >> +  Âif ( 1 ) > >> >> >>   { > >> >> >>     switch ( virtual_vga ) > >> >> >>     { > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > Yes. Vga bios is booted. However, the upstram qemu receives a SIGSEGV > >> >> > signal subsequently. I am trying to print the call stack when > >> >> > receiving the signal. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >>  ÂI find the cause of SIGSEGV signal: > >> >> > >> >>  Âcpu_physical_memory_rw(target_phys_addr_t addr, uint8_t *buf, int > >> >> len, int is_write) > >> >>          ->memcpy(buf, ptr + (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK), l); > >> >> > >> >>   In my case, ptr=0 and addr=0xc253e, when qemu attempts to vist > >> >> 0x53e address, the SIGSEGV signal is generated. > >> >> > >> >>   I believe the qemu is trying to vist vram in this moment. This > >> >> code seems no problem, and I will continue to find the root cause. > >> >> > >> > > >> > The vram is allocated by qemu, see hw/vga.c:vga_common_init. > >> > qemu_ram_alloc under xen ends up calling xen_ram_alloc that calls > >> > xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact. > >> > xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact is the hypercall that should ask Xen to > >> > add the missing vram pages in the guest. Maybe this hypercall is failing > >> > in your case? > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>  ÂI continue to invesgate this bug and find hypercall_mmu_update in > >> qemu_remap_bucket(xc_map_foreign_bulk) is failing: > >> > >> do_mmu_update > >>    ->mod_l1_entry > >>       Â-> Âif ( !p2m_is_ram(p2mt) || unlikely(mfn == INVALID_MFN) ) > >>             Âreturn -EINVAL; > >> > >>  Âmfn==INVALID_MFN, because : > >> > >> mod_l1_entry > >>    ->gfn_to_mfn(p2m_get_hostp2m(pg_dom), l1e_get_pfn(nl1e), &p2mt)); > >>        ->p2m->get_entry > >>             ->p2m_gfn_to_mfn > >>                Â-> if ( gfn > p2m->max_mapped_pfn ) > >>                  Â/* This pfn is higher than the > >> highest the p2m map currently holds */ > >>                  Âreturn _mfn(INVALID_MFN); > >> > >>  ÂThe p2m->max_mapped_pfn is usually 0xfffff. In our case, > >> mmu_update.val exceeds 0x8000000100000000. ÂAdditionally, l1e = > >> l1e_from_intpte(mmu_update.val); gfn=l1e_get_pfn(l1e ). Therefore, gfn > >> will exceed 0xfffff. > >> > >>  ÂIn the case of minios based stubdom, the mmu_update.vals do not > >> exceed 0x8000000100000000. Next, I will invesgate why mmu_update.val > >> exceeds 0x8000000100000000. > > > > It looks like the address of the guest that qemu is trying to map is not > > valid. > > Make sure you are running a guest with less than 2GB of ram, otherwise > > you need the patch series that Anthony sent on Friday: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=131074042905711&w=2 > > Not this problem. I never alloc more than 2GB for the hvm guest. The > call stack in qemu is: > > qemu_get_ram_ptr > ->qemu_map_cache(addr, 0, 1) > -> if (!entry->vaddr_base || entry->paddr_index != > address_index || > !test_bit(address_offset >> > XC_PAGE_SHIFT, entry->valid_mapping)) { > qemu_remap_bucket(entry, size ? : > MCACHE_BUCKET_SIZE, address_index); > ->xc_map_foreign_bulk(xen_xc, > xen_domid, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, > > pfns, err, nb_pfn); > > The qemu tries to map pages from hvm guest(xen_domid) to linux > stubdom. But some hvm pages' pfns are larger than 0xfffff. So, in the > p2m_gfn_to_mfn, the judgement condition is valid:(p2m->max_mapped_pfn > = 0xfffff) > > if ( gfn > p2m->max_mapped_pfn ) > /* This pfn is higher than the highest the p2m map currently holds */ > return _mfn(INVALID_MFN); > > In minios stubdom case, the hvm pages' pfns do not exceed 0xfffff. > Maybe the address translation in linux stubdom cause this probem? Trying to map a pfn > 0xfffff is clearly a mistake if the guest's memory does not exceed 2G: 0xfffff * 4096 > 2G > BTW, in minios stubdom case, there seems no hvmloader process. Is it > needed in linux stubdom? hvmloader is the first thing that runs within the guest, it is not a process in the stubdom or in dom0. It is required in both minios and linux stubdoms. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |