[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: git commit 9fd67b4ed0714ab718f1f9bd14c344af336a6df7 (x86-64: Give vvars their own page) breaks Xen PV guests (64-bit).
> > However, this is what I get later on, any ideas? > > > [ 0.585880] init[1] illegal int 0xcc from 32-bit mode > > ip:ffffffffff600400 cs:e033 sp:7fff230ca088 ax:ffffffffff600400 > > si:7faee3e822bf di:7fff230ca158 > > That will, indeed, crash your system. > > 0xe033 is FLAT_RING3_CS64 > > Jeremy / other Xen people: I'm trying to implement a lightweight > check to distinguish a trap from a sane (i.e. allowable for syscalls) > 64-bit user context from anything else. There seems to be precedent > for using ->cs == __USER_CS to detect 64-bitness; for example, step.c > contains: > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > case 0x40 ... 0x4f: > if (regs->cs != __USER_CS) > /* 32-bit mode: register increment */ > return 0; > /* 64-bit mode: REX prefix */ > continue; > #endif > > The prefetch opcode checker in mm/fault.c does something similar. > > Even the sysret code in xen/xen-asm_64.S does: > > pushq %r11 > pushq $__USER_CS > pushq %rcx > > So I'm at a bit of a loss. > > You could probably hack it up and get your kernel to boot by allowing > __USER_CS and 0xe033 in that check, but I'd rather understand it Did this little hack: diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c index dda7dff..5d0cf37 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ void dotraplinkage do_emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code) * Real 64-bit user mode code has cs == __USER_CS. Anything else * is bogus. */ - if (regs->cs != __USER_CS) { + if ((regs->cs != __USER_CS) && (regs->cs != FLAT_RING3_CS64)) { /* * If we trapped from kernel mode, we might as well OOPS now * instead of returning to some random address and OOPSing diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c index f987bde..0e4c13c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c @@ -1916,6 +1916,7 @@ static void xen_set_fixmap(unsigned idx, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) # endif #else case VSYSCALL_LAST_PAGE ... VSYSCALL_FIRST_PAGE: + case VVAR_PAGE: #endif case FIX_TEXT_POKE0: case FIX_TEXT_POKE1: And getting this on 64-bit: started: BusyBox v1.14.3 (2011-07-26 11:43:49 EDT) [ 0.578603] rcS[1128]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fff40b7380a sp 00007fff40b5c0f0 error 4 [ 0.578847] rcS used greatest stack depth: 5024 bytes left [ 0.581897] sh[1131]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fffb93ff80a sp 00007fffb92bbd70 error 4 [ 1.587637] sh[1137]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007ffffa5ff80a sp 00007ffffa522560 error 4 [ 2.592295] sh[1141]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007ffffcb3f80a sp 00007ffffca98af0 error 4 [ 3.596344] sh[1145]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fff2e3ff80a sp 00007fff2e3e3370 error 4 [ 4.599812] sh[1149]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fff62dff80a sp 00007fff62ca9f10 error 4 [ 5.605835] sh[1153]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fff117ff80a sp 00007fff1175e7f0 error 4 [ 6.609438] sh[1157]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fff91bff80a sp 00007fff91bd71c0 error 4 [ 7.614714] sh[1161]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fff396b280a sp 00007fff3968ede0 error 4 [ 8.620374] sh[1165]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fffd398b80a sp 00007fffd38ecd70 error 4 [ 9.625512] sh[1169]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fff617d980a sp 00007fff61776070 error 4 [ 10.630246] sh[1173]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fff89fff80a sp 00007fff89f7f3b0 error 4 [ 11.635588] sh[1177]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fffa95ff80a sp 00007fffa95ea7c0 error 4 [ 12.640491] sh[1181]: segfault at ffffffffff5ff0a0 ip 00007fff28cd180a sp 00007fff28c524f0 error 4 .. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |