|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] HYBRID: PV in HVM container
Hi folks,
Well, I did some benchmarking and found interesting results. Following
runs are on a westmere with 2 sockets and 10GB RAM. Xen was booted
with maxcpus=2 and entire RAM. All guests were started with 1vcpu and 2GB
RAM. dom0 started with 1 vcpu and 704MB. Baremetal was booted with 2GB
and 1 cpu. HVM guest has EPT enabled. HT is on.
So, unless the NUMA'ness interfered with results (using some memory on
remote socket), it appears HVM does very well. To the point that it
seems a hybrid is not going to be worth it. I am currently running
tests on a single socket system just to be sure.
I am attaching my diff's in case any one wants to see what I did. I used
xen 4.0.2 and linux 2.6.39.
thanks,
Mukesh
L M B E N C H 3 . 0 S U M M A R Y
Processor, Processes - times in microseconds - smaller is better
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS Mhz null null open slct sig sig fork exec sh
call I/O stat clos TCP inst hndl proc proc proc
--------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
PV Linux 2.6.39f 2639 0.65 0.88 2.14 4.59 3.77 0.79 3.62 535. 1294 3308
Hybrid Linux 2.6.39f 2639 0.13 0.21 0.89 1.96 3.08 0.24 1.10 529. 1294 3246
HVM Linux 2.6.39f 2639 0.12 0.21 0.64 1.76 3.04 0.24 3.37 113. 354. 1324
Baremetal Linux 2.6.39+ 2649 0.13 0.23 0.74 1.93 3.46 0.28 1.58 127. 386. 1434
Basic integer operations - times in nanoseconds - smaller is better
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS intgr intgr intgr intgr intgr
bit add mul div mod
--------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
PV Linux 2.6.39f 0.3800 0.0100 0.1700 9.1000 9.0400
Hybrid Linux 2.6.39f 0.3800 0.0100 0.1700 9.1100 9.0300
HVM Linux 2.6.39f 0.3800 0.0100 0.1700 9.1100 9.0600
Baremetal Linux 2.6.39+ 0.3800 0.0100 0.1700 9.0600 8.9800
Basic float operations - times in nanoseconds - smaller is better
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS float float float float
add mul div bogo
--------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------
PV Linux 2.6.39f 1.1300 1.5200 5.6200 5.2900
Hybrid Linux 2.6.39f 1.1300 1.5200 5.6300 5.2900
HVM Linux 2.6.39f 1.1400 1.5200 5.6300 5.3000
Baremetal Linux 2.6.39+ 1.1300 1.5100 5.6000 5.2700
Basic double operations - times in nanoseconds - smaller is better
------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS double double double double
add mul div bogo
--------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------
PV Linux 2.6.39f 1.1300 1.9000 8.6400 8.3200
Hybrid Linux 2.6.39f 1.1400 1.9000 8.6600 8.3200
HVM Linux 2.6.39f 1.1400 1.9000 8.6600 8.3300
Baremetal Linux 2.6.39+ 1.1300 1.8900 8.6100 8.2800
Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 2p/0K 2p/16K 2p/64K 8p/16K 8p/64K 16p/16K 16p/64K
ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw
--------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
PV Linux 2.6.39f 5.2800 5.7600 6.3600 6.3200 7.3600 6.69000 7.46000
Hybrid Linux 2.6.39f 4.9200 4.9300 5.2200 5.7600 6.9600 6.12000 7.31000
HVM Linux 2.6.39f 1.3100 1.2200 1.6200 1.9200 3.2600 2.23000 3.48000
Baremetal Linux 2.6.39+ 1.5500 1.4100 2.0600 2.2500 3.3900 2.44000 3.38000
*Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 2p/0K Pipe AF UDP RPC/ TCP RPC/ TCP
ctxsw UNIX UDP TCP conn
--------- ------------- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
PV Linux 2.6.39f 5.280 16.6 21.3 25.9 33.7 34.7 41.8 87.
Hybrid Linux 2.6.39f 4.920 11.2 14.4 19.6 26.1 27.5 32.9 71.
HVM Linux 2.6.39f 1.310 4.416 6.15 9.386 14.8 15.8 20.1 45.
Baremetal Linux 2.6.39+ 1.550 4.625 7.34 14.3 19.8 21.4 26.4 66.
File & VM system latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS 0K File 10K File Mmap Prot Page 100fd
Create Delete Create Delete Latency Fault Fault selct
--------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ----- ------- -----
PV Linux 2.6.39f 24.0K 0.746 3.55870 2.184
Hybrid Linux 2.6.39f 24.6K 0.238 4.00100 1.480
HVM Linux 2.6.39f 4716.0 0.202 0.96600 1.468
Baremetal Linux 2.6.39+ 6898.0 0.325 0.93610 1.620
*Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS Pipe AF TCP File Mmap Bcopy Bcopy Mem Mem
UNIX reread reread (libc) (hand) read write
--------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -----
PV Linux 2.6.39f 1661 2081 1041 3293.3 5528.3 3106.6 2800.0 4472 5633.
Hybrid Linux 2.6.39f 1974 2450 1183 3481.5 5529.6 3114.9 2786.6 4470 5672.
HVM Linux 2.6.39f 3232 2929 1622 3541.3 5527.5 3077.1 2765.6 4453 5634.
Baremetal Linux 2.6.39+ 3320 2800 1666 3523.6 5578.9 3147.0 2841.6 4541 5752.
Memory latencies in nanoseconds - smaller is better
(WARNING - may not be correct, check graphs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Host OS Mhz L1 $ L2 $ Main mem Rand mem Guesses
--------- ------------- --- ---- ---- -------- -------- -------
PV Linux 2.6.39f 2639 1.5160 5.9170 29.7 97.5
Hybrid Linux 2.6.39f 2639 1.5170 7.5000 29.7 97.4
HVM Linux 2.6.39f 2639 1.5190 4.0210 29.8 105.4
Baremetal Linux 2.6.39+ 2649 1.5090 3.8370 29.2 78.0
Attachment:
hyb.xen.diff Attachment:
hyb.lin.diff _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |