[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH] xen, vtd: Check ownership of a domain context using internal structures
Thanks, Jan. BTW Keir: this particular instance of the patch caused the customer's dom0 to crash on boot, so it's not ready to be applied yet. (Oh the joys of fixing a bug for a system you don't have on-site.) I'll send a new patch when I have one that works properly. -George On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 27.07.11 at 12:36, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Keir, Jan, et al: >> >> Can you take a look at this patch to see if you think this is the >> right way to solve this problem? > > Makes sense, and looks reasonable to me (though I'm far from being > a passthrough expert). > >> This particular patch is still being tested by the partner who saw the >> problem; but a less safe change -- just returning "OK" if the pci >> device didn't exist -- did solve the problem. It seemed like this >> check was probably there for a reason, so I wanted to keep it in >> place. (Although the c/s in which this check was introduced, >> 18906:2941b1a9, only mentioned locking changes, not introduction of >> new checks.) > > Yes, retaining the check is definitely needed. > > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |