[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: don't reject valid DMAR/ATSR tables on systems with multiple PCI segments
On multi-PCI-segment systems, each segment has to be expected to have an include-all DRHD and an all-ports ATSR, so the firmware consistency check incorrectly rejects valid configurations there (which is particularly problematic when the firmware also pre-enabled x2apic mode, as the system will panic in that case due to being unable to enable interrupt remapping). Thus constrain the check to just segment 0 for now; once full multi-segment support is there (which I'm working on), it can be revisited whether we'd want to track this per segment, or whether we trust the firmware of such large systems. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c @@ -418,13 +418,14 @@ acpi_parse_one_drhd(struct acpi_dmar_ent if ( iommu_verbose ) dprintk(VTDPREFIX, " flags: INCLUDE_ALL\n"); /* Only allow one INCLUDE_ALL */ - if ( include_all ) + if ( drhd->segment == 0 && include_all ) { dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX, "Only one INCLUDE_ALL device scope is allowed\n"); ret = -EINVAL; } - include_all = 1; + if ( drhd->segment == 0 ) + include_all = 1; } if ( ret ) @@ -624,13 +625,14 @@ acpi_parse_one_atsr(struct acpi_dmar_ent if ( iommu_verbose ) dprintk(VTDPREFIX, " flags: ALL_PORTS\n"); /* Only allow one ALL_PORTS */ - if ( all_ports ) + if ( atsr->segment == 0 && all_ports ) { dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX, "Only one ALL_PORTS device scope is allowed\n"); ret = -EINVAL; } - all_ports = 1; + if ( atsr->segment == 0 ) + all_ports = 1; } if ( ret ) Attachment:
pci-multi-seg-x2apic-vtd-no-crash.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |