WG: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1.2 - when ?

[Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>]

cced the list WITH attachment...

Signed-off-by: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>

(not sure, whether the line above is necessary).

BR,
Carsten.

----- Originalnachricht -----
Von: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Son, 28.8.2011 23:02
An: Ian.Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: fabio.fantoni <fabio.fantoni@xxxxxxxxxx> ; keir.xen <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> ; 
xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: AW: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1.2 - when ?

Hi,

done. Find attached as file against actual xen-4.1-testing.hg.

BR,
Carsten.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Ian Jackson [mailto:Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. August 2011 17:07
An: Carsten Schiers
Cc: keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fabio Fantoni
Betreff: AW: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1.2 - when ?

(xen-devel added to the CC)

Carsten Schiers writes ("AW: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1.2 - when ?"):
> Hi Keir, did you intentionally left these out for 4.1.2?
> 
> They improve usability of xl toolstack as xend replacement.
> 
> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/0648846b4d17
> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/2ae357405850
> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/c2995f0555af

I'm happy with all of these being backported.

The first two apply cleanly to 4.1-testing.  Keir, should I port them
across or do you have a clever backport script ?

The last one, c2995f0555af, has conflicts.  Carsten, would you care to
post a version against 4.1 ?

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Attachment: xl-4.1-testing.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel