[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 0 of 1] Patch to alter BLKIF_OP_TRIM to BLKIF_OP_DISCARD (v1).
The windows frontends in current XenServer product don't have the trim code enabled since the backends don't really do anything useful with it yet so I have no objection to a name change if it really matters that much. Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 31 August 2011 04:41 > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ian Jackson; Stefano Stabellini; > Ian Campbell; lidongyang@xxxxxxxxxx; Owen Smith; Paul Durrant; > pasik@xxxxxx; JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [PATCH 0 of 1] Patch to alter BLKIF_OP_TRIM to > BLKIF_OP_DISCARD (v1). > > Hey guys, > > Pasi mentioned on Li's (and Owen's) patches which provide TRIM/UNMAP > support to the Linux backend/frontend that: > " > Isn't the generic name for this functionality "discard" in Linux? > > and "trim" being the ATA specific discard-implementation, > and "scsi unmap" the SAS/SCSI specific discard-implementation? > > Just wondering.. > " > > and it sounds right to me. The problem is of course that the > 'feature-trim' > is already in the interface - but I was wondering how much it is set > in stone? Could it be feasible to modify the backend/frontend in > Citrix product to use 'feature-discard' instead? And naturally also > the Novell drivers. > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |