Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 5/7] xen/acpi: Domain0 acpi parser related platform hypercall

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

On 09/21/2011 12:29 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:29:11AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> On 09/06/2011 10:50 PM, Cihula, Joseph wrote:
>>>> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:31 AM
>>>>
>>>> From: Yu Ke <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> This patches implements the xen_platform_op hypercall, to pass the parsed 
>>>> ACPI info to hypervisor.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Ke <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tian Kevin <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> [v1: Added DEFINE_GUEST.. in appropiate headers]
>>>> [v2: Ripped out typedefs]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/ia64/include/asm/xen/interface.h |    1 +
>>>>  arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h  |    1 +
>>>>  include/xen/interface/platform.h      |  320 
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  include/xen/interface/xen.h           |    1 +
>>>>  4 files changed, 323 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
>>>> include/xen/interface/platform.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/xen/interface.h 
>>>> b/arch/ia64/include/asm/xen/interface.h
>>>> index e951e74..1d2427d 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/xen/interface.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/xen/interface.h
>>>> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(char);  DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(int);
>>>> DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(long);  DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(void);
>>>> +DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(uint64_t);
>>>>
>>>>  typedef unsigned long xen_pfn_t;
>>>>  DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_pfn_t);
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h 
>>>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h
>>>> index 5d4922a..a1f2db5 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h
>>>> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(char);  DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(int);
>>>> DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(long);  DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(void);
>>>> +DEFINE_GUEST_HANDLE(uint64_t);
>>>>  #endif
>>>>
>>>>  #ifndef HYPERVISOR_VIRT_START
>>>> diff --git a/include/xen/interface/platform.h 
>>>> b/include/xen/interface/platform.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..c168468
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/include/xen/interface/platform.h
>>> Why are you adding so many new hypercalls that aren't being used in this 
>>> patchset?
>> May as well bring in all the platform-related hypercall definitions at
>> once rather than be piecemeal.
> Actually, I think making it piecemeal might be easier. As in
>  1). Not all of the hypercalls are going to be upstreamed.
>  2). It gives a nice history/idea of what is actually implemented when
>      seaching the code.
>  3). git annotate can give precise git commits for when an functionality was
>      added.
>
> But maybe I am just overthinking it.

If platform.h gets put on multiple branches which depend on it, it would
be easier to merge if it were the same copy in every branch rather than
trying to merge lots of different variants.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel