[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] arch_set_info_guest() and cr1
(old mail, I know) On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 03:17 +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 08/12/2011 03:01 PM, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > Ah I see it, during save/restore, it is used. > > Well, I'm trying to keep the option of using PV paging with hybrid, so > > I may need to honor that. But that's phase 2. > > Though it would be nice to re-enable the use of PV writable pagetables > to get access to HAP, and we could do without that. > > Does Xen require that the user pagetable be a proper subset of the > kernel pagetable? If we can assume that and get proper ring protections > in the HVM container, then we can simply ignore the user pagetable (and > would have to if we want to get good syscall performance). IIRC back when I did the (now completely defunct) supervisor mode kernel stuff that was exactly the assumption which was made and it certainly worked in practice (although "require" might be a strong term). Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |