[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
On 09/28/2011 10:24 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/28/2011 10:22 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Could do something like: >>> >>> if (ticket->head >= 254) >>> prev = xadd(&ticket->head_tail, 0xff02); >>> else >>> prev = xadd(&ticket->head_tail, 0x0002); >>> >>> to compensate for the overflow. >> Oh wow. You havge an even more twisted mind than I do. >> >> I guess that will work, exactly because we control "head" and thus can >> know about the overflow in the low byte. But boy is that ugly ;) >> >> But at least you wouldn't need to do the loop with cmpxchg. So it's >> twisted and ugly, but migth be practical. >> > I suspect it should be coded as -254 in order to use a short immediate > if that is even possible... I'm about to test: static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) { if (TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG && unlikely(arch_static_branch(¶virt_ticketlocks_enabled))) { arch_spinlock_t prev; __ticketpair_t inc = TICKET_LOCK_INC; if (lock->tickets.head >= (1 << TICKET_SHIFT) - TICKET_LOCK_INC) inc += -1 << TICKET_SHIFT; prev.head_tail = xadd(&lock->head_tail, inc); if (prev.tickets.tail & TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG) __ticket_unlock_slowpath(lock, prev); } else __ticket_unlock_release(lock); } Which, frankly, is not something I particularly want to put my name to. It makes gcc go into paroxysms of trickiness: 4a8: 80 3f fe cmpb $0xfe,(%rdi) 4ab: 19 f6 sbb %esi,%esi 4ad: 66 81 e6 00 01 and $0x100,%si 4b2: 66 81 ee fe 00 sub $0xfe,%si 4b7: f0 66 0f c1 37 lock xadd %si,(%rdi) ...which is pretty neat, actually. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |