[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 9/9] xen/p2m/debugfs: Fix potential pointer exception.
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 20:52 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > We could be referencing the last + 1 element of level_name[] > array which would cause a pointer exception. If we end up accessing it does that not mean something, i.e. should it not be a real string here and not NULL? Otherwise isn't it a bug in the lookup code that we end up looking there? I think this lookup correspond to the initialisation of lvl=4 and falling through the subsequent list of checks without matching one. In which case I think level_name[4] should be "unknown" or even "error". I don't think you can hit type_name[4] in the same way, type and prev_type are always one of the TYPE_* defines, which have values 0..3 inclusive. You could make this more obvious and defend against future changes breaking this with: ... type_name[] = { [TYPE_IDENTITY] = "identity", [TYPE_MISSING] = "missing" ... }; Ian. > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/xen/p2m.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c > index 58efeb9..bc4cf0a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c > @@ -786,9 +786,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(m2p_find_override_pfn); > int p2m_dump_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > { > static const char * const level_name[] = { "top", "middle", > - "entry", "abnormal" }; > + "entry", "abnormal", NULL}; > static const char * const type_name[] = { "identity", "missing", > - "pfn", "abnormal"}; > + "pfn", "abnormal", NULL}; > #define TYPE_IDENTITY 0 > #define TYPE_MISSING 1 > #define TYPE_PFN 2 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |