[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen document day (Oct 12 or 26)
2011/10/1 Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 06:33:40PM +0200, Florian Heigl wrote: >> 2011/9/30 Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxx>: >> > Let me know, which date you agreed on. We could do a poll. >> > We should publish on the blog a bit before. >> > Also, how can I help? >> >> One thing where you could probably help best is setting clear rules >> what do document for a release. >> i.e. the 4.0 relnotes had build instructions and a lot more, whereas >> this is missing in the next release note. >> >> either the build instructions were in the wrong place for 4.0 or 4.1 >> was released with incomplete info ;) >> making a checklist sounds *ahem* in place :) >> > > Xen 4.1 releasenotes do state that "check Xen 4.0 releasenotes for build > instructions and more info" :) You see how well that worked for me :) Imagine a magazine which has half of the standard topics missing on it's second issue with a pointer to the last one. And tbh I guess if anyone had re-tested the 4.0 build instructions line by line and found them 100% working then he'd probably have copied them over? Flo -- the purpose of libvirt is to provide an abstraction layer hiding all xen features added since 2006 until they were finally understood and copied by the kvm devs. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |