[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: RFC -- new zone type
On 29 Sep 11 09:38, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > > From: Sameer Pramod Niphadkar [mailto:spniphadkar@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 12:08 AM > > To: Larry Bassel > > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx; vgandhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: RFC -- new zone type > > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Larry Bassel <lbassel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > We need to create a large (~100M) contiguous physical memory region > > > which will only be needed occasionally. As this region will > > > use up 10-20% of all of the available memory, we do not want > > > to pre-reserve it at boot time. Instead, we want to create > > > this memory region "on the fly" when asked to by userspace, > > > and do it as quickly as possible, and return it to > > > system use when not needed. > > > > > > AFAIK, this sort of operation is currently done using memory > > > compaction (as CMA does for instance). > > > Alternatively, this memory region (if it is in a fixed place) > > > could be created using "logical memory hotremove" and returned > > > to the system using "logical memory hotplug". In either case, > > > the contiguous physical memory would be created via migrating > > > pages from the "movable zone". > > > > > > The problem with this approach is that the copying of up to 25000 > > > pages may take considerable time (as well as finding destinations > > > for all of the pages if free memory is scarce -- this may > > > even fail, causing the memory region not to be created). > > > > > > It was suggested to me that a new zone type which would be similar > > > to the "movable zone" but is only allowed to contain pages > > > that can be discarded (such as text) could solve this problem, > > > so that there is no copying or finding destination pages needed (thus > > > considerably reducing latency). > > If I read the above correctly, you are talking about indeed > pre-reserving your ~100MB contiguous chunk of memory but using > it for "discardable" pages only, then discarding all of those > pages when you need the memory region, then going back to using > the contiguous chunk for discardable pages, and so on. Yes, that is exactly what we want to do. > > You may be interested in the concept of "ephemeral pages" > introduced by transcendent memory ("tmem") and the cleancache > patchset which went upstream at 3.0. If you write a driver > (called a "backend" in tmem language) that accepts pages > from cleancache, you would be able to use your 100MB contiguous > chunk of memory for clean pagecache pages when it is not needed > for your other purposes, easily discard all the pages when > you do need the space, then start using it for clean pagecache > pages again when you don't need it for your purposes anymore > (and repeat this cycle as many times as necessary). > > You maybe could call your driver "cleanzone". > > Zcache (also upstream in drivers/staging) does something like > this already, though you might not want/need to use compression > in your driver. In zcache, space reclaim is driven by the kernel > "shrinker" code that runs when memory is low, but another trigger > could easily be used. Also there is likely a lot of code in > zcache (e.g. tmem.c) that you could leverage. > > For more info, see: > http://lwn.net/Articles/454795/ > http://oss.oracle.com/projects/tmem Thanks very much, I'll look into these. > > I'd be happy to answer any questions if you are still interested > after you have read the above documentation. > > Thanks, > Dan Larry > -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |