[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
- To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:39:49 -0700
- Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Glauber <jang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, rth@xxxxxxxxxx, Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:41:36 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On 10/06/2011 11:13 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 11:10 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
>> It would be cool if we could make the total width 2-bytes, when
>> possible. It might be possible by making the initial
>> 'JUMP_LABEL_INITIAL_NOP'
>> as a 'jmp' to the 'l_yes' label. And then patching that with a no-op at boot
>> time or link time - letting the compiler pick the width. In that way we could
>> get the optimal width...
>>
> Yes, that would be a win just based on icache footprint alone.
I'm not sure it would be a win, necessarily. My test with back-to-back
jmp2 was definitely slower than with the nop padding it out to 5 bytes;
I suspect that's a result of having too many jmps within one cacheline.
Of course, there's no reason why the CPU would optimise for jumps to
jumps, so perhaps its just hitting a "stupid programmer" path.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
- References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 0/5] jump-label: allow early jump_label_enable()
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
|