[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Other things we need to do with backend/blkfront Was:Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] interface: Flesh out the BLKIF_OP_DISCARD description
> Could we simplify and say that blkback won't expose discard support > unless the underlying block device is correctly aligned for it? i.e. > encourage people to align their underlying storage correctly? Presumably > doing that has other benefits? It got me thinking that we could do this - but I do not think that should be spelled out in the interface. Rather it is up to the backend to either expose it or not. The check for -1 in backend for that should do it. Keep in mind that the discard operation is a hint, nothing else. It also got me thinking about the aligment offset - which we do not expose to the frontend. That is the one where the 63 sector DOS partition ends up skewing up the whole disk layout. That is seperate from discard operations. It is more of a XenBus attribute. Then there is also the device serial number which we don't expose either. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |