[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] debugfs: Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32
- To: Raghavendra K T <raghukt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:38:29 +0200
- Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:52:50 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:58:47PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 10/24/2011 03:49 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:34:59AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> >>Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32.
> >
> >Why not just rename when you move the functions? Why the extra step?
> >
> Intention was only clarity. Yes, if this patch is an overhead, I 'll
> combine both the patches.
Yeah, it makes more sense as it originally confused me why you were
adding a "xen_*" function to the debugfs core code :)
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
