[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 5/5] kvm guest : pv-ticketlocks support for linux guests running on KVM hypervisor
- To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Raghavendra K T <raghukt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:55:55 +0530
- Cc: "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:04:41 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On 10/26/2011 12:05 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 10/23/2011 12:07 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_DEBUG_FS
+
+#include<linux/debugfs.h>
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_DEBUG_FS */
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */
This is a big mess. Is there any problem with including linux/debugfs.h
unconditionally? Or at least using "#if
defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)&& defined(CONFIG_KVM_DEBUG_FS)"?
I agree. I 'll include unconditionally unless somebody objects.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
