[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Need help with fixing the Xen waitqueue feature


  • To: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Andres Lagar-Cavilla" <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:57:18 -0800
  • Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>, keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:59:10 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=lagarcavilla.org; h=message-id :in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:cc:reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= lagarcavilla.org; b=vPcEaPMej3ott1AxyMGbUJ1AE0GjC6VIGXQejAnwf8So DrketAJSyaE+M0UuBMZBydHxNroEvVCx4ZSn5pXWhv3wgmKJNfVp97R/juh/GTD9 NGiq6og1Q07di7bZeE+bZH8wdyY0LPDoQQrfsu7qHQTsbL/cUIMFwq6kzN5iVS0=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Thanks Jan, and thanks Olaf for the pointers to specific patches. I'll try
to cherry pick those into my dom0 (debian mainline 3.0). Somebody else
should get those in mainline though. Soonish :)

Andres
>>>> On 10.11.11 at 05:29, "Andres Lagar-Cavilla" <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>> The tools retry as long as IOCTL_PRIVCMD_MMAPBATCH_V2 is supported.
>> Which
>> it isn't on mainline linux 3.0, 3.1, etc.
>
> Seems like nobody cared to port over the code from the old 2.6.18 tree
> (or the forward ports thereof).
>
>> Which dom0 kernel are you using?
>
> Certainly one of our forward port kernels.
>
>> And for backend drivers implemented in the kernel (netback, etc), there
>> is
>> no retrying.
>
> As above, seems like nobody cared to forward port those bits either.
>
> Jan
>
>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.