[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] add_to_physmap: Move the code for XENMEM_add_to_physmap

To: Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:58:33 +0100
Cc: allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx, keir@xxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tim@xxxxxxx, JBeulich@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:00:17 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Wed, Nov 16, Jean Guyader wrote:

> Move the code for the XENMEM_add_to_physmap case into it's own
> function (xenmem_add_to_physmap).

This changeset 24163:7a9a1261a6b0 seems to cause the current testsuite failures.
(XEN) Assertion '!in_atomic()' failed at softirq.c:61

preempt_count is like fffffc52 or fffffc00 in my testing.

Olaf

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] add_to_physmap: Move the code for XENMEM_add_to_physmap
  - From: Keir Fraser

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6] IOMMU, vtd and iotlb flush rework (v8)
  - From: Jean Guyader
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] vtd: Refactor iotlb flush code
  - From: Jean Guyader
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/6] iommu: Introduce iommu_flush and iommu_flush_all.
  - From: Jean Guyader
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] add_to_physmap: Move the code for XENMEM_add_to_physmap
  - From: Jean Guyader

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 9872: regressions - FAIL
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Cannot get a shared page in domU
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/6] Introduce per cpu flag (iommu_dont_flush_iotlb) to avoid unnecessary iotlb flush
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] add_to_physmap: Move the code for XENMEM_add_to_physmap
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.