|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 10481: regressions - FAIL
>>> On 13.12.11 at 15:20, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 10481: regressions
> -
> FAIL"):
>> I was about half way through implementing this when it occurred to me
>> that the reaction to a power button press is a guest OS option and can
>> result in a shutdown, a reboot or even a suspend.
>>
>> Unless I'm mistaken?
>
> Firstly, aren't there several possible indications we could send, in
> which case we pick one most likely to make the guest shut down ?
>
> Secondly, having the guest attempt to reboot is probably better than
> simply shooting it in the head. (We could even intercept that and
> have it be destroyed anyway.)
That would be acceptable when picking between shutdown and reboot,
but converting a guest attempt to suspend (to RAM) into shutdown
certainly isn't.
> At least this way if the user wants
> graceful shutdown they can configure the guest to do a shutdown and
> then xl shutdown will work.
>
> At the moment it doesn't work at all without pv drivers.
Isn't that the way it is intended to be?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |