Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 10481: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:20 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 10481: regressions 
> - FAIL"):
> > On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:06 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > That's so that if you say "reboot" or "shutdown" and we press the
> > > guest's power button, we know whether, when the guest does shut down,
> > > whether we actually want to restart it.
> > 
> > That would involve potentially communicating with the daemonized version
> > of xl which is monitoring the domain (if it exists) and/or taking over
> > it's function in the xl instance running the shutdown.
> 
> Yes.  That could be done via xenstore of course.

Sure, but there's still a bunch of moving parts to arrange etc.

> > I'm tempted to just go with the minimal improvement at this stage.
> 
> Fair enough.  It's not going to make the test pass though :-).

Makes the test buggy though :-P

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel