[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2: use HAVE_BYTESWAP_H and _BYTESWAP_H for uclibc compatibility

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Roger Pau MonnÃ <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:05:55 +0100
Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:06:14 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

I'm having second thoughts about this patch, although it works, I'm
not sure it's the right way to do it. I don't know why configure fails
to set HAVE_BYTESWAP_H when using uclibc. Any thoughts?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2: use HAVE_BYTESWAP_H and _BYTESWAP_H for uclibc compatibility
  - From: Roger Pau MonnÃ

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2: use HAVE_BYTESWAP_H and _BYTESWAP_H for uclibc compatibility
  - From: Roger Pau Monne

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 10502: regressions - FAIL
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenstored: Use xenbus_backend device on Linux
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2: use HAVE_BYTESWAP_H and _BYTESWAP_H for uclibc compatibility
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2: use HAVE_BYTESWAP_H and _BYTESWAP_H for uclibc compatibility
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.