[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 8] x86/mm: Fix paging_load


  • To: "Olaf Hering" <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Andres Lagar-Cavilla" <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:49:07 -0800
  • Cc: andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tim@xxxxxxx, adin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:49:45 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=lagarcavilla.org; h=message-id :in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:cc:reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= lagarcavilla.org; b=mQFJ6zF14J/JPetUXKvEHZ01ElDx24QqXv3tnsRJoNa3 1+dXl79dA7zn7PXFI8FJBSELskeDalzuCFS/MVGy+aWb+6EYlizxAAx1oJddR8kp wkjUNCZmAjuzMtTq/TYK6lofw2QNfKVFgbRrqlm07lwPzvH7oO8g9/Oc6L9hQZQ=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

> On Wed, Jan 25, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
>
>> When restoring a p2m entry in the paging_load path, we were not updating
>> the
>> m2p entry correctly.
>
> Thats a good one.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
>
Great!

Now, afaict, the p2m_ram_paging_in state is not needed anymore. Can you
provide feedback as to whether
1. remove p2m_ram_paging_in
2. rename p2m_ram_paging_in_start to p2m_ram_paging_in

sounds like a good plan?

Cheers!
Andres



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.