[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm: replace list_del and INIT_LIST_HEAD with list_del_init



On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 14:03 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Is this safe to take without the other vgic patch?

> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/gic.c |    3 +--
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> index 520a400..c34661b 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> @@ -501,8 +501,7 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, 
> struct cpu_user_regs *r
>                  p->desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
>                  GICC[GICC_DIR] = virq;
>              }
> -            list_del(&p->link);
> -            INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->link);
> +            list_del_init(&p->link);

David said:
        
        I don't think you need the INIT_LIST_HEAD() here (and even if
        you did you should use list_del_init()).  You only need to init
        nodes if you need to test if they are in a list or not.
        
But I'm not seeing where we test if a node is in a list or not, have I
missed it?

>              cpu_raise_softirq(current->processor, VGIC_SOFTIRQ);
>              spin_unlock(&current->arch.vgic.lock);
>          }



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.