|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86: Use deep C states for off-lined CPUs
Fine to me.
BTW, seems another patch moving mwait_ptr declaration and related code into
if(FFH) is slightly better? It's FFH staff anyway.
Thanks,
Jinsong
Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxx>
> # Date 1330642361 -3600
> # Node ID 99df5c6b2964ceaa73651d7bc02fb1ae820f7691
> # Parent a7bacdc5449a2f7bb9c35b2a1334b463fe9f29a9
> x86: Use deep C states for off-lined CPUs
>
> Currently when a core is taken off-line it is placed in C1 state
> (unless MONITOR/MWAIT is used). This patch allows a core to go to
> deeper C states resulting in significantly higher power savings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxx>
>
> diff -r a7bacdc5449a -r 99df5c6b2964 xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c Mon Feb 27 17:05:18 2012 +0000
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c Thu Mar 01 23:52:41 2012 +0100
> @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ static void acpi_dead_idle(void)
> struct acpi_processor_power *power;
> struct acpi_processor_cx *cx;
> void *mwait_ptr;
> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = ¤t_cpu_data;
>
> if ( (power = processor_powers[smp_processor_id()]) == NULL )
> goto default_halt;
> @@ -601,6 +602,23 @@ static void acpi_dead_idle(void)
> mb();
> __mwait(cx->address, 0);
> }
> + }
> + else if ( c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD &&
> + cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_EM_SYSIO )
> + {
> + /* Intel prefers not to use SYSIO */
> +
> + /* Avoid references to shared data after the cache flush */
> + u32 address = cx->address;
> + u32 pmtmr_ioport_local = pmtmr_ioport;
> +
> + wbinvd();
> +
> + while ( 1 )
> + {
> + inb(address);
> + inl(pmtmr_ioport_local);
> + }
> }
>
> default_halt:
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |