[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86: Use deep C states for off-lined CPUs
Fine to me. BTW, seems another patch moving mwait_ptr declaration and related code into if(FFH) is slightly better? It's FFH staff anyway. Thanks, Jinsong Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxx> > # Date 1330642361 -3600 > # Node ID 99df5c6b2964ceaa73651d7bc02fb1ae820f7691 > # Parent a7bacdc5449a2f7bb9c35b2a1334b463fe9f29a9 > x86: Use deep C states for off-lined CPUs > > Currently when a core is taken off-line it is placed in C1 state > (unless MONITOR/MWAIT is used). This patch allows a core to go to > deeper C states resulting in significantly higher power savings. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxx> > > diff -r a7bacdc5449a -r 99df5c6b2964 xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c > --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c Mon Feb 27 17:05:18 2012 +0000 > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c Thu Mar 01 23:52:41 2012 +0100 > @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ static void acpi_dead_idle(void) > struct acpi_processor_power *power; > struct acpi_processor_cx *cx; > void *mwait_ptr; > + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = ¤t_cpu_data; > > if ( (power = processor_powers[smp_processor_id()]) == NULL ) > goto default_halt; > @@ -601,6 +602,23 @@ static void acpi_dead_idle(void) > mb(); > __mwait(cx->address, 0); > } > + } > + else if ( c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD && > + cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_EM_SYSIO ) > + { > + /* Intel prefers not to use SYSIO */ > + > + /* Avoid references to shared data after the cache flush */ > + u32 address = cx->address; > + u32 pmtmr_ioport_local = pmtmr_ioport; > + > + wbinvd(); > + > + while ( 1 ) > + { > + inb(address); > + inl(pmtmr_ioport_local); > + } > } > > default_halt: _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |