Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/vMCE: save/restore MCA capabilities

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 05.03.12 at 21:19, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Another question is, why in the patch mcg_cap defined as per vcpu while 
> others (mcg_ctl/ mcg_status/ mci_ctl) defined as per domain? Semantically it 
> looks some weird anyway.

That question goes back to you (as a company), who wrote the
original code: Why were these made per-domain in the first place
when they're really per-vCPU? All I did here is make per-vCPU
what I needed to touch anyway for save/restore (in order to not
carry over the same mistake into the save/restore definitions and
logic).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel