Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] use INT64_MAX as max expiration

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Zhang, Yang Z writes ("[PATCH] use INT64_MAX as max expiration"):
> Currently, the max expiration time is 2147483647ns(INT32_MAX ns). This is 
> enough when guest is busy, but when guest is idle, the next timer will be 
> later than INT32_MAX ns. And those meaningless alarm will harm the pkg 
> C-state.

This is a power performance improvement, yes ?  Should we be accepting
these into qemu-xen-unstable at this point ?  Although TBH it's quite
a small change so it might be worth making an exception.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel