Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] PAD helper for native and paravirt platform

["Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>]

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 08:56:43AM +0000, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
>>> From f66a2df1392bbe69426387657a220177be50d58a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
>>> 2001 
>> From: Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:32:50 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] PAD helper for native and paravirt platform
>> 
>> This patch is PAD (Processor Aggregator Device) helper.
>> It provides a native interface for natvie platform, and a template
>> for paravirt platform, so that os can implicitly hook to proper ops
>> accordingly. The paravirt template will further redirect to Xen pv
>>  ops in later patch for Xen core parking.
> 
> Liu,
> 
> With this patch: "  xen/enlighten: Expose MWAIT and MWAIT_LEAF if
> hypervisor OKs it." which is now in 3.4-rc0:
> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=blobdiff;f=arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c;h=b132ade26f778f2cfec7c2d5c7b6db48afe424d5;hp=4172af8ceeb363d06912af15bf89e8508752b794;hb=d4c6fa73fe984e504d52f3d6bba291fd76fe49f7;hpb=aab008db8063364dc3c8ccf4981c21124866b395)
> it means that now that the drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c can run
> as is under Xen (as the MWAIT_LEAF is exposed) What is the impact
> of that? Is the monitor call causing a trap to the hypervisor which
> will ignore the call? Or will it have some more worrysome
> consequences? 
> 

IMO this patch doesn't affect acpi_pad logic (both native and xen acpi_pad).
For native acpi_pad, it need mwait to enter deep Cx (but irrelative to this 
patch);
For xen acpi_pad, it doesn't depend on whether hypervisor expose mwait or not. 
It simply parse 'pur' obj and then hypercall to hypervisor to do rest 
core_parking things (BTW, hypervisor core parking patches have checkin in as 
c/s 25095/25096).

Thanks,
Jinsong
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel