Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2] Support for Paging/Sharing on AMD

["Andres Lagar-Cavilla" <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> On Thu, Mar 29, Tim Deegan wrote:
>
>> That is, can we just drop this whole test?
>
> I'm ok with removing the existing boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor test,
> check only hap_enabled() and return -ENODEV otherwise.
>
> A recent change added need_iommu() check, this should be moved up into
> the -ENODEV case becasue -EXDEV is for PoD.

That was me. Either it has to be lumped with ENODEV or EXDEV. I considered
that EXDEV is the right answer. Both PoD and iommu are Xor cases with
another DEV. As opposed to no support at all (ENODEV)

Andres

>
> Olaf
>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel