[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
- To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 06:21:15 +0530
- Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:52:54 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 03/31/2012 01:56 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
What is the current status of this patchset? I haven't looked at it too
closely because I have been focused on 3.4 up until now...
Thanks Peter,
Currently targeting the patchset for next merge window. IMO These
patches are in good shape now. I' ll rebase these patches and send it
ASAP. It needs "jumplabel split patch" (from Andrew Jones) as
dependency, I would fold that patch (got ok from him for that) also
into series, and send them ASAP.
- Raghu
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
