[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] xl doesn't honour the parameter cpu_weight from my config file while xm does honour it
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Perhaps it would be better to have a single sched_params struct which
> contained all the parameters needed for any scheduler, and simply have
> them ignored by libxl for schedulers we're not using.
my first version has this type of design and then someone said that this
was not a good design and I have to use union with libxl_sched_*_params.
Anyway I think it is a good design to have one struct with all parameters
and I'am willing to implement it.
--
Gruß
Dieter
--
I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software.
If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your
address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the
>From field.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
